H... | Xwapseries.lat - Vaishnavy And Sharun Raj P15

| Approach | Latency (95 pct) | Energy Impact | Remarks | |----------|------------------|---------------|---------| | Standard QUIC | 82 ms | 0 % | Baseline | | BBR Congestion Control | 71 ms | –2 % | Improves throughput but not latency predictability. | | MPTCP with Scheduler | 64 ms | –5 % | Reduces loss but adds complexity. | | XWapseries.Lat (P15 H) | 38 ms | –30 % | First work to combine predictive scheduling with edge‑offload and adaptive redundancy. |

The P15 H implementation of XWapseries.Lat demonstrates that latency‑aware prediction + adaptive scheduling can halve perceived network latency while simultaneously lowering device energy consumption. The architecture is lightweight, portable, and compatible with existing transport protocols, making it a strong candidate for integration into forthcoming Wi‑Fi 7 and 5G‑NR‑U ecosystems. XWapseries.Lat - Vaishnavy And Sharun Raj P15 H...

| Metric | S1 (Baseline) | S2 (Static) | S3 (P15 H) | S4 (Stress) | S5 (Mobility) | |--------|---------------|------------|----------------|--------------|---------------| | 95 th‑pct Latency | 82 ms | 56 ms | 38 ms | 54 ms | 41 ms | | Packet loss (overall) | 3.9 % | 2.3 % | 0.6 % | 1.5 % | 0.8 % | | Energy (W) | 1.12 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.80 | | Throughput (Mbps) | 45 | 46 | 48 | 47 | 48 | | Adaptive Redundancy Rate | — | 0 % | 7 % (average) | 5 % | 6 % | | Edge‑offload Utilisation | — | 0 % | 38 % (CPU‑intensive frames) | 34 % | 36 % | | Approach | Latency (95 pct) | Energy

All improvements are statistically significant (p < 0.001). The P15 H implementation of XWapseries