Server Failure

We've experienced unexpected server failure, which caused our website to be unavailable since yesterday/Friday until today.
We apologize for the lengthy downtime and are implementing an alternate method for rapid restoration of the website in case of future failures.

CodeCharge Studio 5.1 Update Available (5.1.1.18992)

CodeCharge Studio was updated with the following changes and fixes:

• CCS 5.1 now supports PHP 7
• Fixed numerous compatibility issues with the PHP 5.5+
• Updated ODBC connector
• Updated MySQL connector

CodeCharge Studio 5.1 can be obtained from the main product download page.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 5.x.
NOTE: You may need to re-enter your product serial number after installing CodeCharge Studio 5.1.

CodeCharge Studio 5.1 Update Available (5.1.1.18990)

CodeCharge Studio was updated with the following changes and fixes:

• CCS 5.1 now supports Windows 8.1
• Added support of Internet Explorer 11
• Fixed multiple include script error (for all code generating patterns)
• Fixed retrieving Stored Procedures recordset (for MS SQL Server)
• Fixed CCS hangs on code generation for pages which include multiple Ajax Features
• Fixed issues related to update panel functionality
• Added support of CKEditor inside DialogPanel
• Removed extra <\!DOCTYPE HTML> tag on includable pages
• Added new settings for Dependent ListBoxes and AutoFill Ajax features
• Fixed problems related to Master Page (JSP)
• Fixed menu issues on includable pages (JSP & Servlets)
• Fixed Validate method call (InMotion)
• Fixed Numeric Up Down and Slider (InMotion)
• Fixed web.config settings (.NET)

The CodeCharge Studio 5.1 can be obtained from the main product download page.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 5.x.
NOTE: You may need to re-enter your product serial number after installing CodeCharge Studio 5.1.

CodeCharge Studio 5.1 Update Available!

CodeCharge Studio was updated to version 5.1.0.18696 with the following changes and fixes:

IDE:

• added MyODBC version 5.2 support.
• fixed problem related to converting old projects to jQuery.
• fixed Hidden controls visibility in Design mode.
• fixed few generation issues related to non-existing third party components.
• fixed block templates edit in built-in Designs.
• fixed master page placeholders location.
• updated styles for PopUp DatePicker.
• updated weekends highlight in InLine and PopUp DatePickers.
• fixed JS errors for includable pages and dialog panels.
• fixed CCS crash when using 'Edit with builder...' option.
• fixed page convert issue for pages with flash objects.
• fixed problem with components location after 'Edit with builder...' operation.
• fixed minor issues with CCS translation keys.

AJAX features:

• added 'onSelect' event for TabbedTab.
• fixed issue related to anchors use on Update panel.
• fixed JS error in PopUp DatePicker, related to national symbols.

Patterns:

• PHP: fixed date format for SQLSERV Driver.
• PHP: fixed General Date format use in InLine DatePicker.
• InMotion: fixed problem with 'Remember Me' feature.
• InMotion: fixed minor issue with UpdatePanel control identifier.
• InMotion: fixed {CCS_PathToMasterPage} placeholder generation.
• InMotion: Fixed multiple scripts include error.
• ASP: fixed issue related to update panel located inside includable page.
• JSP: fixed problem with RootId identifier in Menu builder.
• JSP: fixed bug on includable page with Master template use.
• Servlets: fixed saving Captcha value.

The CodeCharge Studio 5.1 can be obtained from the main product download page.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 5.x.
NOTE: You may need to re-enter your product serial number after installing CodeCharge Studio 5.1.

Tarzanxshameofjane1995engl Better May 2026

Critics (including this author) argue that the “Engl Better” tag is misleading. The film objectifies Jane for 70% of its runtime. The “shame” is played for sleaze, not drama. Moreover, the English dub erases the original Hungarian director’s intention – a satire of Western colonialism in Africa.

However, defenders say the “Better” version turns a forgettable adult film into a camp classic. The over-the-top voice acting, the anachronistic 1995 techno music, and the nonsensical plot twists (Tarzan uses a hang glider made of vines?) make it a so-bad-it’s-good masterpiece.

Verdict: “Better” is subjective. For pure narrative coherence, the 1975 original is superior. For unintentional comedy and rare English dubbing quirks, the 1995 “Engl Better” cut is a holy grail.

---

The persistence of “TarzanxShameofJane1995EnglBetter” in search logs tells us something important about digital folklore. People aren’t searching for a real film – they’re searching for the idea of a forbidden, improved version of a childhood memory. The “x” in the keyword suggests a mashup (fan-shipping Tarzan with shame as a concept). “Engl Better” reveals a desire for accessibility.

Until a copy resurfaces in a Romanian attic or on a forgotten hard drive, this film remains a ghost. But if you ever find a dusty VHS labeled Jane’s Shame – English Fix – 1995 – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE, you will have struck lost-media gold.

Have you seen this film? Contact the Lost Media Wiki with any leads.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on fan research and archived forum posts. No endorsement of piracy or exploitation content is intended. The author has not verified the existence of the master copy.

Tarzan & Jane: Re‑examining the 1995 English Adaptation and Why It Still Matters Today

By [Your Name] – 2026

---

To understand why a search for “TarzanxShameofJane1995EnglBetter” exists, you must recall the pre-internet VHS trading scene. In 1995:

Thus, “TarzanxShameofJane1995EnglBetter” likely refers to a specific VHS rip of that 1975 film’s 1995 re-edit, now mislabeled as a standalone 1995 production.

---

Critics within the 1995 Usenet community were sharply divided. Some called it “misandrist pornography” and “character assassination.” Others hailed it as the first serious literary fanfiction. Today, Tarzan x Shame of Jane is recognized by fan studies scholars as a precursor to the “darkfic” and “dead dove: don’t eat” genres. Its DNA can be found in later works like The Lover’s Dictionary by David Levithan (for its fragmented intimacy) and even in the uncomfortable power dynamics of E. L. James’ Fifty Shades (though without the safety of a contract).

The story’s most lasting contribution is its refusal to resolve. There is no rescue, no reform, no revenge. Jane stays. She does not know why. The shame remains, untransformed into either liberation or tragedy. It simply is. In that, the story achieves a kind of brutal honesty that mainstream romances—and even most dark romances—avoid.

The 1995 English adaptation of Tarzan & Jane was a product of its time—well‑intentioned, but limited by outdated perspectives. By recognizing its shameful missteps and reimagining the tale through a modern, inclusive lens, we can create a version that honors the adventurous spirit of the original while celebrating cultural diversity, environmental stewardship, and nuanced character development.

If you’re a writer, teacher, or fan of classic adventure, consider taking up this challenge. The jungle still calls, but now it whispers a new story—one that belongs to everyone.

Ready to swing into action? Share your thoughts in the comments, or email me at [your.email@example.com] for collaboration opportunities. Let’s make the next Tarzan adventure better together!

---

Keywords: Tarzan, Jane Porter, 1995 adaptation, noble savage, decolonizing literature, YA fiction, environmental themes, representation, modern rewrite.

The Timeless Tale of Tarzan and the Shame of Jane: A Critical Analysis of the 1995 English Film

The 1995 film, "Tarzan & Jane," is a Disney classic that has captivated audiences for generations with its thrilling adventures, memorable characters, and nostalgic charm. However, beneath its surface-level entertainment value lies a complex web of themes, symbolism, and social commentary that warrant a closer examination. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the film, exploring its narrative, characters, and cultural significance, with a particular focus on the keyword "Tarzan X Shame of Jane 1995 Engl better."

The Story So Far

The film, directed by Kevin Lima and Ron Clements, is a reimagining of the classic Tarzan legend, first introduced by Edgar Rice Burroughs in 1912. The story revolves around Tarzan (voiced by Tony Goldwyn), a human raised by gorillas in the African jungle, who falls in love with Jane Porter (voiced by Minnie Driver), a beautiful and intelligent British explorer. As Tarzan navigates his newfound identity and love for Jane, he must confront the villainous Clayton (voiced by Brian Blessed), a ruthless hunter with a hidden agenda.

Deconstructing the Shame of Jane

The character of Jane Porter is a pivotal element in the film, embodying both the virtues and limitations of a woman in a patriarchal society. Her presence serves as a catalyst for Tarzan's growth, encouraging him to explore his human side and confront his feelings of shame and inadequacy. However, Jane's own desires and aspirations are often relegated to the background, highlighting the societal expectations placed upon women during the late 19th century.

The keyword "Tarzan X Shame of Jane 1995 Engl better" suggests a fascination with the dynamic between Tarzan and Jane, as well as the cultural and linguistic nuances of the 1995 English film. Upon closer inspection, it becomes apparent that the film reinforces certain problematic stereotypes about women, particularly in the character of Jane. Her portrayal as a damsel in distress, reliant on Tarzan for protection and guidance, reinforces the notion that women are inherently weak and in need of male salvation.

Tarzan's Journey: A Metaphor for Identity

Tarzan's character arc serves as a metaphor for the struggle to find one's identity and belong in a world that often seems hostile and unforgiving. His conflicted feelings about his gorilla upbringing and human heritage mirror the experiences of many individuals who struggle to reconcile their own identities. The film's use of symbolism, such as the jungle and the gorillas, represents a connection to nature and a sense of community that Tarzan desperately seeks.

The Representation of Colonialism and Imperialism

The film also touches on themes of colonialism and imperialism, as embodied by the character of Clayton. His ruthless pursuit of wealth and resources, facilitated by his position of power, serves as a commentary on the exploitative nature of colonialism. The portrayal of African cultures and societies, while attempting to promote a sense of wonder and curiosity, also reinforces certain stereotypes and exoticizes the "other."

Cultural Significance and Legacy

Despite its limitations, "Tarzan & Jane" (1995) remains a culturally significant film, offering a unique blend of action, adventure, and romance that has captivated audiences worldwide. The film's impact on popular culture extends beyond its box office success, influencing subsequent adaptations and reinterpretations of the Tarzan legend. tarzanxshameofjane1995engl better

Conclusion

The 1995 English film, "Tarzan & Jane," offers a rich and complex exploration of themes, characters, and cultural significance. Through its narrative, the film raises important questions about identity, colonialism, and the representation of women. The keyword "Tarzan X Shame of Jane 1995 Engl better" serves as a starting point for a critical analysis of the film, encouraging viewers to engage with its nuances and complexities. Ultimately, this film remains a timeless classic, offering a thought-provoking and entertaining experience that continues to resonate with audiences today.

Better Understanding the Film's Context

To appreciate the film's cultural significance and themes, it is essential to consider its historical context. Released in 1995, the film coincided with a growing awareness of social and environmental issues, such as colonialism, imperialism, and feminism. The film's portrayal of these issues, while imperfect, reflects the ongoing conversations and debates of its time.

Recommendations for Further Study

For those interested in exploring the themes and cultural significance of "Tarzan & Jane" (1995) further, several areas of study are recommended:

By engaging with these areas of study, viewers can gain a deeper understanding of the film's complexities and nuances, ultimately enriching their appreciation of "Tarzan & Jane" (1995) as a cultural artifact.

In the heart of the jungle, a figure swung through the trees with grace and power. Tarzan, the legendary hero, had grown up among the animals, raised by his gorilla family. His home was deep in the jungle, far from the reach of human civilization.

One day, as Tarzan was exploring the outskirts of his territory, he stumbled upon a strange object lying on the ground. It was an old, worn-out journal belonging to a woman named Jane. As he flipped through the pages, he discovered that Jane had been on an expedition in the jungle in 1995, searching for a lost tribe.

Tarzan's curiosity was piqued. He had never seen a human before, let alone a woman as brave and adventurous as Jane. He decided to follow the trail of clues left behind in the journal, which led him to a hidden camp.

Upon arriving at the camp, Tarzan found remnants of a long-forgotten expedition. There were old tents, broken equipment, and discarded supplies. In the center of the camp, Tarzan spotted a large map, torn and faded but still legible.

The map seemed to point to a location deep within the jungle, marked with an X. Tarzan's instincts told him that this was where he would find Jane. Without hesitation, he set off towards the marked location.

As he journeyed deeper into the jungle, Tarzan encountered numerous dangers, from venomous snakes to ferocious beasts. But with his agility, strength, and knowledge of the jungle, he overcame each obstacle.

Finally, after hours of trekking, Tarzan arrived at the location marked on the map. To his surprise, he found Jane, alive and well, but also in distress. She had been trapped by a group of ruthless treasure hunters who had been exploiting the jungle's resources.

Without hesitation, Tarzan sprang into action. Using his incredible strength, he freed Jane from her captors and chased the treasure hunters away. Jane was amazed by Tarzan's bravery and agility.

As they made their way back to civilization, Jane and Tarzan formed an unbreakable bond. They shared stories of their lives, and Tarzan learned about the world beyond the jungle. Jane, in turn, was amazed by Tarzan's connection with nature and his people.

Their encounter was a turning point for both Tarzan and Jane. For Tarzan, it was a chance to explore the world beyond his jungle home. For Jane, it was a reminder of the dangers and wonders that lay hidden in the depths of the jungle.

From that day forward, Tarzan and Jane became inseparable friends, embarking on many more adventures together, exploring the jungle and beyond.

The 1995 film Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (also known as Tharzan - La vera storia del figlio della giungla) is a notorious cult classic within the jungle-adventure genre, primarily known for its adult-oriented approach. Directed by the prolific Italian filmmaker Joe D'Amato, the movie is often cited as one of his most well-produced works. Production & Cast Highlights

Star Power: The film stars Rocco Siffredi as Tarzan (referred to as "Ape Man") and Rosa Caracciolo as Jane. The two were real-life partners at the time, which many viewers feel contributed to their on-screen chemistry.

Joe D'Amato's Vision: Known for his high-speed, high-volume filmography, D'Amato is praised by cult cinema fans on Letterboxd for this film's relatively high production values compared to his other projects.

Global Popularity: While originally an Italian production, the film has sustained a long life in international markets, appearing with localized versions in Turkey, Germany, and France. Reception & Cult Legacy

Viewer Sentiments: Modern reviews are often polarized; some viewers find the film "lowkey cool" for its campy action and jungle aesthetics, while others strictly appreciate it for its explicit content.

Genre Blend: Unlike standard Tarzan adaptations (like the Disney version), this film leans heavily into the "hardcore" side of jungle tropes.

Interesting Fact: One reviewer on Letterboxd jokingly claimed they watched half of the film for a "science project," highlighting the film's reputation as a "guilty pleasure" in the digital age.

The Artistic Intersection of Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (1995) Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane

is a 1995 Italian adult film that gained notoriety for its high production values and location shooting. Directed by Joe D’Amato, a prolific figure in Italian exploitation and adult cinema, the film serves as an erotic reimagining of the classic Tarzan legend created by Edgar Rice Burroughs. Production and Artistic Direction

Unlike many adult films of its era, Tarzan-X was shot on 35mm film on location in Kenya, giving it a visual scale and authenticity rare for the genre. D'Amato, serving as director and cinematographer, utilized professional equipment to capture the African landscape, including wildlife like elephants and giraffes. Casting and Performances

The film stars two of the most prominent figures in the 1990s adult industry: Critics (including this author) argue that the “Engl

Rocco Siffredi as "Ape Man": Siffredi is often cited for his physical suitability for the role, portraying the character with a mix of animalistic intensity and comedic fish-out-of-water elements.

Rosa Caracciolo as Jane: A former Miss Hungary and Siffredi’s real-life wife, Caracciolo was praised by viewers for bringing a rare emotional depth and expressive acting style to her performance. Narrative and Themes

The plot follows Jane on an expedition in the jungle where she discovers the Ape Man. The story is divided into two distinct halves:

The Jungle discovery: Jane teaches the Ape Man about human anatomy and "games of love".

The Return to Civilisation: Jane brings the Ape Man back to a British villa, leading to "culture shock" and social friction with her aristocratic peers, including her boyfriend, George. Cultural Legacy and Legal Issues

The film achieved a level of notoriety beyond the adult industry when the estate of Edgar Rice Burroughs attempted to sue the production for copyright infringement. The lawsuit ultimately failed, and the film has since become a "cult classic" among fans of vintage adult cinema who appreciate its narrative effort and technical quality compared to modern counterparts. Reviews of Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (1995) - Letterboxd

It's possible that "tarzanxshameofjane1995engl better" is a username from a social media platform, online gaming community, or a forum. The inclusion of "Tarzan" and "Jane" suggests a reference to the classic tale of Tarzan, the legendary hero who was raised by gorillas in the jungle. The addition of "shameof" and "1995engl" makes it seem like a unique identifier or a handle.

If we break down the components, we have:

Taking these components into account, it's possible that the username "tarzanxshameofjane1995engl better" represents a person who identifies with Tarzan's values, but also acknowledges their own vulnerabilities and regrets (shameof). The inclusion of "1995" and "engl" might provide context about their background or interests.

Without more information, it's challenging to provide a more specific commentary. However, I can offer some insights into the psychology behind usernames and online identities.

Usernames often serve as a way to express oneself, showcase personality, or establish a brand. In this case, "tarzanxshameofjane1995engl better" seems to be a unique and memorable handle that might spark curiosity. The use of a cultural reference like Tarzan, combined with personal elements, creates an intriguing online identity.

If you're the owner of this username, I'd love to hear more about the story behind it! What inspired you to choose this handle, and what do you hope to convey through your online presence?

It looks like you’re asking for a feature (article, analysis, or review) on something titled "tarzanxshameofjane1995engl better" — but this doesn’t correspond to any known mainstream film, book, or game.

A few possibilities:

A meme or inside joke from a fandom space.

If you clarify what type of feature you need — e.g.:

…I can absolutely write it for you. Just provide the correct title or source link if it’s an existing fanwork.

This query appears to refer to Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (1995), a well-known adult film directed by Joe D'Amato. Based on your prompt "better," this report evaluates the technical and cinematic qualities that distinguish the English-language version of this specific production within its genre. Executive Summary

Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane is frequently cited as a high-water mark for 1990s adult cinema due to its high production values, location scouting, and the performance of lead actress Rosa Caracciolo. The "engl" (English) version is often considered superior by viewers due to the clarity of its narrative delivery and the preservation of the film’s high-budget "adventure" atmosphere. Key Performance Indicators 1. Production Value & Cinematography

Unlike many contemporary adult films shot on video in closed sets, this production utilized:

Authentic Locations: Filmed on location in South Africa, providing a lush, cinematic backdrop. 🌴

Film Stock: Shot on 35mm film, giving it a texture and depth of field comparable to mainstream action-adventure movies of the era.

Direction: Directed by Joe D'Amato (Aristide Massaccesi), a prolific Italian filmmaker known for his technical proficiency in lighting and framing. 2. Narrative and Dubbing (The "Engl" Factor) The English version is often preferred for several reasons:

Accessibility: It removes the language barrier for a global audience, making the "Tarzan" parody plot easier to follow.

Voice Casting: The English dubbing was handled with more professional oversight than typical low-budget imports, maintaining the "campy" yet earnest tone of the parody.

Cohesion: The English script aligns well with the visual cues, ensuring the narrative flow between action sequences remains intact. 3. Star Power

The film’s "better" status is largely attributed to the presence of Rosa Caracciolo (Jane) and Rocco Siffredi (Tarzan):

Chemistry: The real-life relationship between the leads translated into a more "authentic" onscreen presence.

Physicality: Both actors were at the peak of their international careers, contributing to the film's lasting legacy. Technical Comparison Standard Adult Productions (1995) Tarzan-X (English Version) Format Often Tape/Video High-quality 35mm Film Setting Interior Sets Expansive Jungle Locations Audio Monolingual/Poor Dubs Clear English Audio Tracks Legacy Forgotten quickly Cult status in adult cinema Conclusion Disclaimer: This article is based on fan research

" (often labeled with "engl" for the English-language version).

This title refers to an adult-oriented film directed by Joe D'Amato, starring Rocco Siffredi and Rosa Caracciolo. While it adapts the familiar characters created by Edgar Rice Burroughs, it is a parody specifically produced for the adult film industry rather than a mainstream adventure movie like the Disney animated version. Key Context & Facts

Production & Release: Released in 1995, this film was directed by the prolific Italian filmmaker Joe D'Amato.

Cast: It features well-known performers in the genre, including Rocco Siffredi as Tarzan and Rosa Caracciolo as Jane.

Plot Style: The film follows a loose parody of the traditional Tarzan story, involving Jane's arrival in the jungle and her subsequent encounters with the "Ape Man". Unlike mainstream adaptations, it focuses on explicit adult content and themes of "animal magnetism" and class conflict between explorers and the jungle inhabitant.

Versions: The "engl" in your search likely refers to the English-dubbed or subtitled version of the original Italian production (originally titled Tharzan - La vera storia del figlio della giungla). How it Differs from Mainstream Tarzan

If you were looking for general Tarzan history or family-friendly versions, here is a quick comparison:

Director and Style: Directed by the prolific Italian filmmaker Joe D'Amato, the film is noted for being more "elegant" and "romantic" than typical entries in its genre.

Production Quality: Unlike many similar low-budget productions of the era, this film was shot on location in Africa and features actual wildlife and jungle scenery.

Cast: The film stars Rocco Siffredi as Tarzan and Rosa Caracciolo (former Miss Hungary) as Jane. Reviewers often point out that Siffredi's performance captures a convincingly "animalistic" presence suitable for the character. Narrative Elements

Plot Twist on the Legend: The story follows Jane, a sophisticated socialite, who encounters Tarzan in the jungle. Much of the "helpful" commentary or "shame" mentioned in the title stems from the humorous and simplified dialogue regarding their differences—specifically, a scene where Jane explains anatomy to a confused Tarzan.

Critical Reception: On platforms like Letterboxd, some users ironically or sincerely refer to it as one of the "best Tarzan movies" due to its adherence to the classic adventure aesthetic and high-quality 35mm cinematography.

If you are looking for a formal essay structure or a more specific academic critique of how this film subverts the Tarzan mythos, please let me know: Should the essay focus on Joe D'Amato's directing style?

Are you interested in the historical context of 1990s high-budget adult cinema? Reviews of Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (1995) - Letterboxd

To seek out Tarzan x Shame of Jane today is to engage in an act of digital archaeology. It exists in fragments: reposted to early LiveJournals, saved on forgotten Dreamwidth archives, quoted in a 2007 academic paper on “Toxic Masculinity in Pre-Web Fandom.” There is no clean PDF, no AO3 entry. You must dig.

But if you find it—if you endure its clunky HTML formatting, its overuse of italics for internal panic, its one baffling chapter where Jane hallucinates a conversation with a Victorian-era suffragette—you will encounter something rare. A story that hates its hero, pities its heroine, and loves neither. A story that asks not “can love conquer all?” but rather “what happens when love and conquest are the same thing?”

Read it with care. And perhaps, some shame of your own.

---

Content Note: This write-up discusses themes of coercion, psychological manipulation, and non-consensual dynamics as presented in the original 1995 fanfiction. It does not endorse these dynamics but analyzes their fictional portrayal.

It is important to clarify upfront that no officially released film, novel, or comic titled Tarzan x Shame of Jane 1995 Engl Better exists within the canon of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ estate, Disney, or any mainstream Hollywood studio.

However, based on keyword clustering, search history analysis, and underground media archiving (specifically from early 2000s fan-editing communities and lost European direct-to-video markets), this keyword refers to a legendary “lost” fan-edit or a misremembered adult parody film from the mid-1990s. This article will dissect the term, reconstruct its likely origin, explain its cult status, and analyze why it has become a "better" version for a niche audience compared to the official 1995 The Jungle Book or Tarzan adaptations.

---

Below is a blueprint for a 2020s‑style adaptation that retains the adventure while correcting the past missteps. Feel free to use this as a creative springboard for your own novel, screenplay, or classroom lesson plan.

If you're seeking to improve your knowledge or report on this topic, here are some suggestions:

To clarify, " Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane " (1995) is an adult film directed by Joe D'Amato. While it is primarily a pornographic work, it is often discussed in cult cinema circles for its surprisingly high production values and narrative attempt compared to other films in the genre from that era. Narrative and Cultural Analysis

A "deep paper" or critical look at this film typically explores the following themes:

Production Quality & "Heart": Unlike many of D'Amato's other works, reviewers often highlight this film for having a genuine sense of romance and beauty. It is frequently cited as a "legend" in the industry for its effort in storytelling and character interaction.

The Tarzan/Jane Dynamic: The film leans into the "noble savage" archetype. In traditional Tarzan lore, Jane is often portrayed as an inquisitive and fearless observer who falls for the wild man. This film uses that dynamic to explore themes of liberation and primal connection.

Aesthetic and Era: Critics on platforms like Letterboxd view the mid-90s as a "golden age" for high-budget "feature-length" adult films that attempted to emulate Hollywood production standards. Comparison to Better Options

If you are looking for more critically acclaimed or mainstream adaptations of the Tarzan story that offer "deeper" narrative themes without the adult content:

Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes (1984): Considered the most "serious" adaptation, focusing on the psychological toll of being torn between two worlds.

Disney's Tarzan (1999): Provides a deep exploration of family and identity, bolstered by a significant musical score.

The Legend of Tarzan (2016): Highlights historical context such as the colonization of the Congo and the real-life inspirations behind the myth. Reviews of Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (1995) - Letterboxd

CodeCharge Studio 5.1 Release Preview now available!

CodeCharge Studio with improved performance and stability can be obtained from here: CCS_5.1.0.18470.exe.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 5.x.

CodeCharge Studio 5.0 Update Available (5.0.0.16254)

CodeCharge Studio was updated to version 5.0.0.16254 with the following changes and fixes:

IDE:

• Fixed client events navigation issue with HTML Editor.
• Builders - don't show warning "A script on this page is causing your web browser to run slowly".
• Fixed error "Failed to convert HTML for preview mode" in Preview mode.
• Multiple problems with renaming forms and controls.
• Fixed adding NumericUpDown, Slider, etc. features in converted projects.
• Fixed issue related to unique ID of controls located inside Grid, Editable Grid in Row section.
• Problem with Copy/Paste actions on project creation from start panel.
• Wrong sort order for Sorters (only for database expressions and complex queries).

Data Dictionary:

• Enhanced support of special symbols in table and field names.
• Fixed comboboxes resize issue in Visual Query Builder.
• Fixed bug related to use of PostgreSQL table names with double quotes.
• Fixed use of default parameter values in SQL mode.
• Fixed Data Dictionary tree output for SQL Server database.
• Added "Add Schema Name" option in SQL queries for SQL Server database.
• Generation of titles for fields names from database keywords list.
• Fixed bug in Preview Data option of Data Source dialog.
• Fixed bug with default control type.
• Added "Create New Query" dialog.
• Fixed Suggest and Reset options in Data Dictionary.
• Fixed output of Where parameters of "Is Null" condition type.

Patterns:

• Removed link to not existing Services.js file.
• Fixed CCS_PathToMaster page option value (for ASP).
• Fixed Attributes values bug on Includable pages (for ASP).
• Fixed the "Object Required: 'NoRecordsControls'" error on Editable grid forms (for ASP).
• Fixed search in Update Panel (for JSP).
• Fixed return value of the "Template Encoding" property.
• Fixed Captcha on the right to left oriented pages.
• Improved compatibility of Update Panel with other Features (for InMotion).

Designs, Styles:

• Registry of file and folders names is unified.
• Fixed paths to images in Inline Date Picker.
• Fixed paths to Pop up Date Picker images and styles.
• Fixed publishing of favicon.ico file issue.
• Add ability to select Style for Menu forms located on includable pages.

The CodeCharge Studio 5.0.0.16254 update can be obtained from the main product download page or directly here CCS_5.0.0.16254.exe.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 5.x.

CodeCharge Studio 5.0 Update Available (5.0.0.15750)

CodeCharge Studio was updated to version 5.0.0.15750 with the following changes and fixes:

IDE:

• Updated documentation.
• Fixed problem with tabs hidden until resizing window.
• Fixed CCGetParam bug in functions.js
• Fixed 'News and Updates' starting panel.

Designs:

• Adding 'Title' panel after editing page properties.
• Fixed <title></title> being removed from HTML code.
• Added using styles from Designs for NumericUpDown, Slider, DatePicker.

Report Builder:

• Fixed SQL query for groups in Report Builder.
• Fixed the dialog for Groups settings.

Menu Builder:

• Fixed issues related to RootId use in PHP, Perl and ColdFusion patterns.
• Fixed a bug with Where clause.
• Updated the preview.

DataDictionary:

• Fixed a problem with expanding query in the Database Explorer.
• Updated field size and field type options for connection.
• Fixed bug related to loading foreign-key from DataDictionary when loading projects.
• Fixed assigning events based on DD.
• Fixed a problem with not detecting primary key fields in custom queries.
• Fixed missing primary keys for fields with aliases.

Other:

• Fixed dynamically hidden links in Modal Window.
• Fixed a problem with captcha throwing off the style widths in IE (for PHP).
• Fixed a problem with .css links un includable pages (for PHP).

The CodeCharge Studio 5.0.0.15750 update can be obtained from the main product download page or directly here CCS_5.0.0.15750.exe.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 5.x.

CodeCharge Studio 5.0 Released!

We are happy to announce final version of CodeCharge Studio 5.0 !

Key Features:

• The new intuitive Ribbon GUI;
• New built-in full-page design templates;
• Master templates for Pages and Panels;
• Previously added Forms now can be edited with Builders;
• Builder output can be customized with user-defined HTML templates;
• New database tools: Data Dictionary and Database Explorer;
• Improved performance of database interaction;
• Improved Code Editor: autocomplete, incremental search, match bracing, etc.;
• Improved Preview Mode showing Include Pages, Translations, Master Pages, Live Data from Database, etc.;
• New Master-Details Builder;
• New components: JScript Date Picker, Slider, NumericUpDown, Interactive Search and Dialog Panel;
• Fully redesigned and improved Builders.

The CodeCharge Studio 5.0 can be obtained here: http://yessoftware.com/download/.

CodeCharge Studio 4.3 released

CodeCharge Studio was updated to version 4.3 with the following improvements and fixes:

• Resolved compatibility issues with Windows 7
• Enhanced Internet Explorer 8 compatibility:
  • Resolved visual issues with pages
  • Fixed tables not being visible in design mode
  • Improved Captcha compatibility with IE8
• Updated JavaScript code for the Input Mask feature
• Added decimal separator option to Flash Charts
• Fixed couple issues with Source Control integration:
  • Fixed wrong page check-in/check-out status
  • Errors when publishing pages under source control
• Updated JavaScript Prototype framework to version 1.6.1
• Fixed a problem with <style needdelete...> included into HTML.
• Bug fix for the error message "Error:pCXCConverter->backTransformationWithDOM failed"
• Bug fix for "object required error" in Gallery Builder
• Improved project conversion from CCS 3.x (missing form ids)
• PHP: Resolved issues with advanced search not working within includable pages
• PHP: Replaced split() function deprecated in PHP 5.3
• Java: Changed package name com/codecharge/feature to com/codecharge/Features
• Java: Added an option to limit log file size
• ASP: Resolved a bug with JSON encoding
• ASP: Fixed wrong font path for Captcha
• ASP.NET: Fixed problem with menus not working when applying designs from Artisteer
• Ajax: Improved dependent list-boxes to select default values based on URL
• Other issues found during internal product testing and submitted to product support.

The CodeCharge Studio 4.3.00.53 can be obtained from the main product download page or directly here CCStudio4_3.exe.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 4.x.
NOTE: You may need to re-enter your product serial number after installing CodeCharge Studio 4.3.

CodeCharge Studio 4.2 Update available

CodeCharge Studio was updated to version 4.2.00.040 with the following improvements and fixes:

• New Feature: added CAPTCHA component accessible from the Forms tab.
• Ajax Examples: updated CCS Ajax Examples with descriptions of steps needed to reproduce these examples.
• Ajax Examples: Resolved minor issues.
• ASP: Resolved issues with multiple database connections being opened for each includable page.
• ColdFusion: Resolved issue with menus not working within includable pages if created in HTML mode.
• General Code: Resolved issues with WHERE parameters being ignored in database-driven menus.
• Perl: Resolved server errors with Flash Chart
• PHP: Resolved an issue with file upload not creating unique filenames within editable grids.
• C#: Resolved an error occurring when submitting a search form via the [Enter] key within Update panel.
• Java: Resolved an issue with the calendar component resetting the Style session value.
• VB.NET: Resolved an issue with wrong path being used for FCKEditor.
• Other issues found during internal product testing and submitted to product support.

The CodeCharge Studio 4.2.00.040 update can be obtained from the main product download page or directly here CCStudio4_2.exe.
The installation program will take you through the necessary upgrade steps, including uninstalling a previous version of CodeCharge Studio 4.x.