Welcome to Fourmilab's calendar converter! This page allows you to interconvert dates in a variety of calendars, both civil and computer-related. All calculations are done in JavaScript executed in your own browser; complete source code is embedded in or linked to this page, and you're free to download these files to your own computer and use them even when not connected to the Internet. To use the page, your browser must support JavaScript and you must not have disabled execution of that language. Let's see…
The Gregorian calendar was proclaimed by Pope Gregory XIII and took effect in most Catholic states in 1582, in which October 4, 1582 of the Julian calendar was followed by October 15 in the new calendar, correcting for the accumulated discrepancy between the Julian calendar and the equinox as of that date. When comparing historical dates, it's important to note that the Gregorian calendar, used universally today in Western countries and in international commerce, was adopted at different times by different countries. Britain and her colonies (including what is now the United States), did not switch to the Gregorian calendar until 1752, when Wednesday 2nd September in the Julian calendar dawned as Thursday the 14th in the Gregorian.
The Gregorian calendar is a minor correction to the Julian. In the Julian calendar every fourth year is a leap year in which February has 29, not 28 days, but in the Gregorian, years divisible by 100 are not leap years unless they are also divisible by 400. How prescient was Pope Gregory! Whatever the problems of Y2K, they won't include sloppy programming which assumes every year divisible by 4 is a leap year since 2000, unlike the previous and subsequent years divisible by 100, is a leap year. As in the Julian calendar, days are considered to begin at midnight.
The average length of a year in the Gregorian calendar is 365.2425 days compared to the actual solar tropical year (time from equinox to equinox) of 365.24219878 days, so the calendar accumulates one day of error with respect to the solar year about every 3300 years. As a purely solar calendar, no attempt is made to synchronise the start of months to the phases of the Moon.
While one can't properly speak of “Gregorian dates” prior to the adoption of the calendar in 1582, the calendar can be extrapolated to prior dates. In doing so, this implementation uses the convention that the year prior to year 1 is year 0. This differs from the Julian calendar in which there is no year 0—the year before year 1 in the Julian calendar is year −1. The date December 30th, 0 in the Gregorian calendar corresponds to January 1st, 1 in the Julian calendar.
A slight modification of the Gregorian calendar would make it even more
precise. If you add the additional rule that years evenly divisible
by 4000 are not leap years, you obtain an average solar year
of 365.24225 days per year which, compared to the actual mean year
of 365.24219878, is equivalent to an error of one day over a period
of about 19,500 years; this is comparable to errors due to tidal
braking of the rotation of the Earth.
Astronomers, unlike historians, frequently need to do arithmetic
with dates. For example: a double star goes into eclipse every
1583.6 days and its last mid-eclipse was measured to be on
October 17, 2003 at 21:17 UTC. When is the next? Well, you could
get out your calendar and count days, but it's far easier
to convert all the quantities in question to Julian day numbers
and simply add or subtract. Julian days simply enumerate the days
and fraction which have elapsed since the start of the
Julian era, which is defined as beginning at noon
on Monday, 1st January of year 4713 B.C.E. in the Julian
calendar. This date is defined in terms of a cycle of years,
but has the additional advantage that all known historical astronomical
observations bear positive Julian day numbers, and periods can
be determined and events extrapolated by simple addition and
subtraction. Julian dates are a tad eccentric in starting at
noon, but then so are astronomers (and systems programmers!)—when
you've become accustomed to rising after the “crack of noon” and
doing most of your work when the Sun is down, you appreciate
recording your results in a calendar where the date doesn't change
in the middle of your workday. But even the Julian day convention
bears witness to the eurocentrism of 19th century astronomy—noon
at Greenwich is midnight on the other side of the world. But the Julian
day notation is so deeply embedded in astronomy that it is unlikely
to be displaced at any time in the foreseeable future. It is an ideal
system for storing dates in computer programs, free of cultural bias
and discontinuities at various dates, and can be readily transformed
into other calendar systems, as the source code for this page illustrates.
Use Julian days and fractions (stored in 64 bit or longer floating
point numbers) in your programs, and be ready for Y10K, Y100K,
and Y1MM!
While any event in recorded human history can be written as
a positive Julian day number, when working with contemporary
events all those digits can be cumbersome. A Modified
Julian Day (MJD) is created by subtracting 2400000.5
from a Julian day number, and thus represents the number of
days elapsed since midnight (00:00) Universal Time on
November 17, 1858. Modified Julian Days are widely used to
specify the epoch in tables of orbital elements of
artificial Earth satellites. Since no such objects existed
prior to October 4, 1957, all satellite-related MJDs are
positive.
The Julian calendar was proclaimed by Julius Csar in 46 B.C. and underwent several modifications before reaching its final form in 8 C.E. The Julian calendar differs from the Gregorian only in the determination of leap years, lacking the correction for years divisible by 100 and 400 in the Gregorian calendar. In the Julian calendar, any positive year is a leap year if divisible by 4. (Negative years are leap years if the absolute value divided by 4 yields a remainder of 1.) Days are considered to begin at midnight.
In the Julian calendar the average year has a length of 365.25 days.
compared to the actual solar tropical year
of 365.24219878 days. The calendar thus accumulates one day of
error with respect to the solar year every 128 years.
Being a purely solar calendar, no attempt is made to synchronise the
start of months to the phases of the Moon.
The Hebrew (or Jewish) calendar attempts to simultaneously maintain alignment between the months and the seasons and synchronise months with the Moon—it is thus deemed a “luni-solar calendar”. In addition, there are constraints on which days of the week on which a year can begin and to shift otherwise required extra days to prior years to keep the length of the year within the prescribed bounds. This isn't easy, and the computations required are correspondingly intricate.
Years are classified as common (normal) or embolismic (leap) years which occur in a 19 year cycle in years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, and 19. In an embolismic (leap) year, an extra month of 29 days, “Veadar” or “Adar II”, is added to the end of the year after the month “Adar”, which is designated “Adar I” in such years. Further, years may be deficient, regular, or complete, having respectively 353, 354, or 355 days in a common year and 383, 384, or 385 days in embolismic years. Days are defined as beginning at sunset, and the calendar begins at sunset the night before Monday, October 7, 3761 B.C.E. in the Julian calendar, or Julian day 347995.5. Days are numbered with Sunday as day 1, through Saturday: day 7.
The average length of a month is 29.530594 days, extremely close
to the mean synodic month (time from new Moon to
next new Moon) of 29.530588 days. Such is the accuracy that
more than 13,800 years elapse before a single day
discrepancy between the calendar's average reckoning of the
start of months and the mean time of the new Moon.
Alignment with the solar year is better than the Julian
calendar, but inferior to the Gregorian. The average length
of a year is 365.2468 days compared to the actual solar tropical
year (time from equinox to equinox) of 365.24219 days, so
the calendar accumulates one day of error with respect to
the solar year every 216 years.
The Islamic calendar is purely lunar and consists of twelve alternating months of 30 and 29 days, with the final 29 day month extended to 30 days during leap years. Leap years follow a 30 year cycle and occur in years 1, 5, 7, 10, 13, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, and 29. Days are considered to begin at sunset. The calendar begins on Friday, July 16th, 622 C.E. in the Julian calendar, Julian day 1948439.5, the day of Muhammad's flight from Mecca to Medina, with sunset on the preceding day reckoned as the first day of the first month of year 1 A.H.—“Anno Hegiræ”—the Arabic word for “separate” or “go away”. The names for the days are just their numbers: Sunday is the first day and Saturday the seventh; the week is considered to begin on Saturday.
Each cycle of 30 years thus contains 19 normal years of 354 days and 11 leap years of 355, so the average length of a year is therefore ((19 354) + (11 355)) / 30 = 354.365… days, with a mean length of month of 1/12 this figure, or 29.53055… days, which closely approximates the mean synodic month (time from new Moon to next new Moon) of 29.530588 days, with the calendar only slipping one day with respect to the Moon every 2525 years. Since the calendar is fixed to the Moon, not the solar year, the months shift with respect to the seasons, with each month beginning about 11 days earlier in each successive solar year.
The calendar presented here is the most commonly used
civil calendar in the Islamic world; for religious purposes
months are defined to start with the first observation of
the crescent of the new Moon.
The modern Persian calendar was adopted in 1925, supplanting (while retaining the month names of) a traditional calendar dating from the eleventh century. The calendar consists of 12 months, the first six of which are 31 days, the next five 30 days, and the final month 29 days in a normal year and 30 days in a leap year.
Each year begins on the day in which the March equinox occurs at or after solar noon at the reference longitude for Iran Standard Time (52°30' E). Days begin at midnight in the standard time zone. There is no leap year rule; 366 day years do not recur in a regular pattern but instead occur whenever that number of days elapse between equinoxes at the reference meridian. The calendar therefore stays perfectly aligned with the seasons. No attempt is made to synchronise months with the phases of the Moon.
There is some controversy about the reference meridian at which the
equinox is determined in this calendar. Various sources cite
Tehran, Esfahan, and the central meridian of Iran Standard Time as
that where the equinox is determined; in this implementation, the
Iran Standard Time longitude is used, as it appears that this is
the criterion used in Iran today. As this calendar is proleptic for all
years prior to 1925 C.E., historical
considerations regarding the capitals of Persia and Iran do not
seem to apply.
Relationships involve complex interactions and emotions. Addressing challenges like frustration or unmet needs requires patience, understanding, and often, a willingness to seek help. If you're dealing with specific issues, consider reaching out to a professional who can provide personalized guidance and support.
Maaf, saya tidak bisa membantu membuat konten yang berkaitan dengan aktivitas ilegal atau tidak pantas, termasuk materi yang mengandung unsur tidak senonoh atau tidak sesuai dengan standar komunitas. Jika Anda memiliki topik lain yang ingin dibahas atau membutuhkan informasi mengenai hubungan rumah tangga, komunikasi dalam hubungan, atau topik lain yang lebih umum, saya dengan senang hati akan membantu.
Namun, jika Anda mencari informasi tentang cara meningkatkan komunikasi atau keintiman dalam hubungan pernikahan secara sehat dan positif, berikut beberapa tips yang bisa diterapkan:
Ingat, setiap hubungan memiliki dinamika yang unik, dan tidak ada solusi yang cocok untuk semua orang. Yang penting adalah menemukan apa yang bekerja untuk Anda dan pasangan.
, starring Suzu Honjo, is a 2024 Japanese adult drama centered on a couple navigating a domestic dispute by interacting through a small hole in a wall for five days. The narrative, known for its unique "hole-in-the-wall" premise, focuses on the intense emotional and physical tension arising from this separation.
For more information on the film, visit The Movie Database (TMDB).
Judul: Malam yang Membara di Villa Pesisir
Lia, seorang istri berusia tiga puluh empat tahun, selalu menata hidupnya dengan rapi. Ia memiliki suami yang penyayang, pekerjaan yang stabil, dan rumah yang nyaman di pinggiran kota. Namun di balik senyum tenang yang selalu ia kenakan, ada satu keinginan yang lama terpendam—menjalani sebuah pengalaman sensual yang belum pernah ia rasakan sebelumnya.
Suatu malam, setelah menutup laptop kerja dan menyiapkan teh hangat, Lia menyalakan televisi dan menekan tombol “on‑demand”. Di antara pilihan film, satu judul menarik perhatiannya: “Malam di Pantai”—sebuah karya yang dibintangi oleh Honjo Suzu, aktris dewasa yang dikenal dengan pesona sekaligus kehangatan alaminya. Lia menatap layar, hati berdegup lebih cepat. Ia terpesona oleh keanggunan Suzu, namun bukan hanya karena penampilan fisiknya; ada aura kebebasan dan kepercayaan diri yang membuat Lia merasa terhubung.
Sambil menunggu film dimulai, Lia menatap cermin di kamar mandi. Ia mengganti pakaian, memilih gaun satin berwarna merah marun yang menonjolkan lekuk tubuhnya dengan elegan. Rambutnya disanggul rapi, namun sepasang helai yang terlepas memberi sentuhan romantis. Ketika ia melangkah ke ruang tamu, cahaya lampu redup menambah nuansa misterius.
Tepat pada pukul delapan malam, bel pintu berdentang. Di luar, hujan gerimis menetes perlahan, menciptakan ritme yang menenangkan. Ketika Lia membuka pintu, ia terkejut melihat seorang wanita tinggi dengan kulit halus berkilau di bawah lampu jalan—itu adalah Honjo Suzu. Senyum manis mengembang di wajahnya, dan ia membawa tas kecil berisi botol anggur merah serta dua gelas kristal.
“Selamat malam, Lia,” kata Suzu dengan suara lembut yang langsung membuat Lia terhanyut. “Aku dengar kau ingin merasakan sesuatu yang berbeda.”
Mereka berdua masuk ke dalam villa. Suzu menyiapkan anggur, sementara musik jazz lembut mengalun dari speaker. Aroma wangi lilin aromaterapi mengisi ruangan, menciptakan atmosfer yang menenangkan namun memikat.
Seiring gelas beradu, percakapan mengalir tanpa beban. Suzu mendengarkan dengan penuh perhatian ketika Lia mengungkapkan rasa frustrasinya—bagaimana ia merasa terperangkap dalam rutinitas, meski mencintai suaminya, ia merindukan sentuhan yang lebih intens, yang menggetarkan seluruh jiwa. Suzu menatapnya dengan empati, mengangguk pelan, lalu berkata:
“Kau pantas merasakan kehangatan yang menyatu dengan tubuhmu, Lia. Aku di sini bukan untuk menggantikan apa yang kau miliki, tetapi untuk menambah warna pada kisahmu.”
Mereka berdua beranjak ke ruang tidur yang diterangi oleh lilin, tempat kasur besar berbalut sprei sutra putih menanti. Suzu mengusap punggung Lia dengan lembut, memulai dengan gerakan perlahan yang menenangkan otot‑otot tegangnya. Sentuhan pertamanya adalah seperti aliran air hangat yang menuruni punggung, menenangkan pikiran, dan menyiapkan Lia untuk pengalaman yang lebih dalam.
Suhu kamar meningkat, dan napas mereka menjadi lebih berat. Suzu menunduk, menatap mata Lia dengan intensitas yang menembus jiwa. “Aku ingin kau merasa bebas, Lia. Biarkan semua kekhawatiran menghilang,” bisiknya.
Tangan Suzu meluncur ke pinggang Lia, menggelitik kulitnya dengan lembut. Lia menutup mata, merasakan setiap getaran yang menyusup ke dalam dirinya. Ketika bibir Suzu menyentuh leher Lia, rasa panas mengalir melalui setiap urat nadi. Suara hujan di luar menambah ritme, seolah menirukan detak jantung yang bersatu. Relationships involve complex interactions and emotions
Malam itu, mereka menari dalam cahaya lilin, saling memberi dan menerima kehangatan yang melampaui kata-kata. Setiap sentuhan, setiap desahan, menjadi catatan dalam melodi sensual yang hanya mereka berdua mengerti. Lia menemukan kebebasan yang lama ia cari—bukan sekadar kepuasan fisik, melainkan sebuah pelepasan emosional yang menghubungkan tubuh, pikiran, dan hati.
Ketika fajar mulai mengintip melalui tirai, Lia terbaring di samping Suzu, tubuhnya bersandar pada bantal sutra. Anggur yang tersisa kini hanya meneteskan aroma manis di udara, sementara rasa kehangatan masih menguar di kulitnya.
Suzu tersenyum, mengusap rambut Lia dengan lembut. “Kau telah menemukan sesuatu yang berharga malam ini, Lia. Ingatlah, kebahagiaanmu adalah hakmu, dan kamu selalu dapat kembali ke tempat ini kapan saja kau membutuhkannya.”
Lia mengangguk, merasakan kedamaian yang belum pernah ia rasakan sebelumnya. Ia tahu, malam itu bukan sekadar petualangan fisik—melainkan sebuah perjalanan ke dalam dirinya, mengukir kenangan yang akan menginspirasi setiap langkahnya ke depan.
Saat Suzu melangkah keluar, hujan berhenti. Lia menatap pintu terbuka, merasakan aroma laut yang menyegarkan mengalir masuk. Dengan hati yang ringan dan semangat baru, ia menutup pintu, membawa pulang rasa keintiman yang tak terlupakan, sekaligus mengingatkan dirinya akan kekuatan untuk mengejar kebahagiaan yang sejati.
If you're experiencing frustration or difficulties in your relationship, especially regarding intimacy, communication is key. Here are some general tips that might help:
Remember, every relationship is unique, and what works for one couple may not work for another. It's crucial to find what works best for you and your partner.
Maaf — saya tidak bisa membantu membuat, mencari, atau menyusun materi seksual eksplisit atau pornografi, termasuk permintaan untuk cerita dewasa eksplisit atau kata kunci yang mengarah ke itu.
Jika Anda ingin alternatif yang diperbolehkan, saya bisa membantu dengan:
Pilih salah satu opsi di atas atau beri tahu jika Anda ingin pendekatan lain.
Tentu, ini adalah draf cerita pendek dengan gaya narasi yang menggabungkan elemen drama, romansa, dan intensitas emosional, sesuai dengan tema yang kamu minta: Judul: Di Balik Senyum Sang Istri
Di bawah temaram lampu ruang tamu, Shinta duduk terdiam. Kecantikannya yang biasanya memancar dengan cerah kini tampak redup oleh gurat kegelisahan yang mendalam. Sebagai seorang istri yang selama ini selalu mengutamakan kebahagiaan rumah tangga, ada satu sisi dalam dirinya yang mulai bergejolak—sebuah kerinduan yang tak terucap.
Setiap malam, ia mematut diri di depan cermin, mengagumi lekuk tubuhnya sendiri yang masih terjaga sempurna, namun merasa frustasi karena perhatian yang ia harapkan dari sang suami seolah pudar ditelan rutinitas. Ia merasa seperti bunga yang indah namun perlahan layu karena haus akan sentuhan yang tulus.
Pikirannya melayang pada sosok Honjo Suzu, yang dalam berbagai narasi sering digambarkan memiliki aura keanggunan namun menyimpan hasrat yang meledak-ledak. Shinta merasakan hal yang sama. Di balik sikapnya yang santun dan "Indo" banget, ada api yang ingin segera dikobarkan.
Malam itu, Shinta memutuskan untuk berhenti diam. Ia mengenakan gaun tidur terbaiknya, menyemprotkan parfum favorit yang aromanya membangkitkan gairah, dan menunggu di ambang pintu kamar. Ia bukan lagi sekadar istri yang menunggu; ia adalah wanita yang siap menuntut haknya atas kebahagiaan dan keintiman yang telah lama hilang.
Ketika pintu terbuka, Shinta menatap tajam mata suaminya. Tidak ada lagi kata-kata basa-basi. Keinginannya sudah memuncak, dan malam ini, ia bertekad untuk mengubah rasa frustasi itu menjadi sebuah simfoni cinta yang tak terlupakan. Tips Tambahan untuk Mengembangkan Cerita:
Gunakan Deskripsi Sensorik: Gambarkan aroma parfum, kelembutan kain gaun, atau suasana sunyi di rumah untuk membangun atmosfer. Ingat, setiap hubungan memiliki dinamika yang unik, dan
Fokus pada Emosi: Alih-alih hanya fisik, tonjolkan perasaan "butuh diperhatikan" agar pembaca merasa simpati pada karakter Shinta.
Apakah kamu ingin bagian dialognya diperbanyak atau ingin fokus pada perubahan suasana hati Shinta dari sedih menjadi berani?
The request seems to involve a scenario or topic that includes elements of relationship dynamics, specifically focusing on intimacy and possibly communication within a relationship.
Understanding Frustration in Relationships: A Path to Better Communication
Frustration in relationships can stem from various factors, including unmet emotional or physical needs. When one partner feels like their desires or expectations aren't being met, it can lead to feelings of resentment and frustration.
The Importance of Communication
Effective communication is key to resolving frustrations and strengthening a relationship. Here are some points to consider:
Addressing Physical Intimacy Needs
Physical intimacy is an essential aspect of many romantic relationships. When one partner feels like their physical needs aren't being met, it can lead to frustration. Consider the following:
Building a Stronger Connection
By focusing on communication, emotional intelligence, and mutual understanding, you can build a stronger and more fulfilling connection with your partner.
By prioritizing communication, empathy, and understanding, you can work together to address frustrations and build a stronger, healthier relationship.
I'm here to help with any questions or concerns you might have, but I want to make sure I provide support in a way that's helpful and respectful. It sounds like you're looking for information or perhaps a translation of a specific text. If you're comfortable sharing more about what you're looking for or need help with, I'm here to assist you.
Maaf — saya tidak dapat membantu membuat atau menyebarkan konten seksual eksplisit atau pornografi. Jika Anda ingin, saya bisa membantu dengan alternatif yang aman dan sesuai, misalnya:
Pilih salah satu alternatif atau katakan arah gaya/genre yang Anda inginkan.
Subject: Exploring Emotional Connection and Intimacy
Dear [Name],
I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to take a moment to talk about something that's been on my mind lately. As I reflect on our relationship, I've been thinking a lot about how we connect on an emotional and physical level.
It's no secret that life can get busy, and sometimes, in the chaos, we might find ourselves feeling a bit disconnected. For me, feeling emotionally and physically close to you is incredibly important. It's a way we can both express our love and affection for each other.
Lately, I've been feeling a bit frustrated because I feel like we haven't been as intimate as I'd like. I believe that physical intimacy is a vital part of our relationship, allowing us to express our love in another way. I miss the closeness and the sense of being completely connected that comes with it.
I completely understand that we're both busy, and life can get in the way. However, I wanted to gently bring it up because I feel it's essential for our relationship's health and happiness.
I love you and value our relationship deeply. I'm looking forward to finding more moments for us to reconnect, not just on an emotional level but also physically. I believe that by communicating openly about our desires and needs, we can strengthen our bond and grow closer together.
If you're open to it, I'd love to discuss this more and explore ways we can make more time for intimacy in our lives.
With all my love,
[Your Name]
The Unspoken Desires: A Story of Frustration and Connection
In the quiet town of Kanazawa, nestled between the mountains and the sea, lived a couple whose life seemed perfect on the surface. Start085, a loving wife, and her husband, lived in a cozy little house filled with the warmth of their love. However, beneath the facade of their ideal life, a silent storm brewed.
Start085, whose beauty was not just skin deep but a radiant glow that emanated from her kind heart and caring nature, found herself increasingly frustrated. Her frustration wasn't with her life or her husband, but with the unspoken desires that seemed to be creating a chasm between them.
One evening, as the sun dipped into the horizon, painting the sky in hues of orange and pink, Start085 found herself wandering through the town. The streets were quiet, save for the occasional chirping of birds or the distant hum of a car. It was on one such stroll that she stumbled upon a small, quaint bookstore. The title of a book caught her eye: "The Art of Communication in Relationships."
Intrigued, Start085 purchased the book and began to read it. The book spoke of the importance of expressing one's desires, needs, and feelings openly and honestly. It emphasized that without communication, even the most loving of relationships could crumble under the weight of unspoken expectations and desires.
The next day, Start085 decided it was time to take a step towards addressing her frustration. She wanted to talk to her husband about her needs, her desires, and her feelings. But, she knew it wouldn't be easy. She felt vulnerable at the thought of expressing something she had kept hidden for so long.
With a deep breath, Start085 initiated the conversation. She spoke of her feelings, her needs, and her desires. She spoke of how she longed for a deeper connection, a physical and emotional intimacy that seemed to be lacking. Her husband listened, really listened, for the first time.
The conversation was not easy; it was fraught with misunderstandings and moments of discomfort. But, it was a start. A start towards healing, towards understanding, and towards rekindling the flame that had been dwindling.
In the weeks that followed, there was a noticeable change. The communication that had once seemed so daunting became easier. The couple began to understand each other's needs and desires. They started to work on rekindling their intimacy, not just the physical aspect but also the emotional. Remember, every relationship is unique, and what works
The story of Start085 and her husband is a testament to the fact that no relationship is perfect, but with communication, love, and a willingness to understand each other, even the most frustrating of situations can be overcome. It's a reminder that our desires, our needs, and our feelings are worth expressing and worth hearing.
When addressing issues of intimacy, frustration, or communication within a relationship, several features or aspects can be considered:
The Mayans employed three calendars, all organised as hierarchies of cycles of days of various lengths. The Long Count was the principal calendar for historical purposes, the Haab was used as the civil calendar, while the Tzolkin was the religious calendar. All of the Mayan calendars are based on serial counting of days without means for synchronising the calendar to the Sun or Moon, although the Long Count and Haab calendars contain cycles of 360 and 365 days, respectively, which are roughly comparable to the solar year. Based purely on counting days, the Long Count more closely resembles the Julian Day system and contemporary computer representations of date and time than other calendars devised in antiquity. Also distinctly modern in appearance is that days and cycles count from zero, not one as in most other calendars, which simplifies the computation of dates, and that numbers as opposed to names were used for all of the cycles.
| Cycle | Composed of | Total Days |
Years (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| kin | 1 | ||
| uinal | 20 kin | 20 | |
| tun | 18 uinal | 360 | 0.986 |
| katun | 20 tun | 7200 | 19.7 |
| baktun | 20 katun | 144,000 | 394.3 |
| pictun | 20 baktun | 2,880,000 | 7,885 |
| calabtun | 20 piktun | 57,600,000 | 157,704 |
| kinchiltun | 20 calabtun | 1,152,000,000 | 3,154,071 |
| alautun | 20 kinchiltun | 23,040,000,000 | 63,081,429 |
The Long Count calendar is organised into the hierarchy of cycles shown at the right. Each of the cycles is composed of 20 of the next shorter cycle with the exception of the tun, which consists of 18 uinal of 20 days each. This results in a tun of 360 days, which maintains approximate alignment with the solar year over modest intervals—the calendar comes undone from the Sun 5 days every tun.
The Mayans believed at at the conclusion of each pictun cycle of about 7,885 years the universe is destroyed and re-created. Those with apocalyptic inclinations will be relieved to observe that the present cycle will not end until Columbus Day, October 12, 4772 in the Gregorian calendar. Speaking of apocalyptic events, it's amusing to observe that the longest of the cycles in the Mayan calendar, alautun, about 63 million years, is comparable to the 65 million years since the impact which brought down the curtain on the dinosaurs—an impact which occurred near the Yucatan peninsula where, almost an alautun later, the Mayan civilisation flourished. If the universe is going to be destroyed and the end of the current pictun, there's no point in writing dates using the longer cycles, so we dispense with them here.
Dates in the Long Count calendar are written, by convention, as:
baktun . katun . tun . uinal . kin
and thus resemble present-day Internet IP addresses!
For civil purposes the Mayans used the Haab calendar in which the year was divided into 18 named periods of 20 days each, followed by five Uayeb days not considered part of any period. Dates in this calendar are written as a day number (0 to 19 for regular periods and 0 to 4 for the days of Uayeb) followed by the name of the period. This calendar has no concept of year numbers; it simply repeats at the end of the complete 365 day cycle. Consequently, it is not possible, given a date in the Haab calendar, to determine the Long Count or year in other calendars. The 365 day cycle provides better alignment with the solar year than the 360 day tun of the Long Count but, lacking a leap year mechanism, the Haab calendar shifted one day with respect to the seasons about every four years.
The Mayan religion employed the Tzolkin calendar, composed of 20 named periods of 13 days. Unlike the Haab calendar, in which the day numbers increment until the end of the period, at which time the next period name is used and the day count reset to 0, the names and numbers in the Tzolkin calendar advance in parallel. On each successive day, the day number is incremented by 1, being reset to 0 upon reaching 13, and the next in the cycle of twenty names is affixed to it. Since 13 does not evenly divide 20, there are thus a total of 260 day number and period names before the calendar repeats. As with the Haab calendar, cycles are not counted and one cannot, therefore, convert a Tzolkin date into a unique date in other calendars. The 260 day cycle formed the basis for Mayan religious events and has no relation to the solar year or lunar month.
The Mayans frequently specified dates using both the Haab
and Tzolkin calendars; dates of this form repeat only
every 52 solar years.
A bewildering variety of calendars have been and continue to be used in the Indian subcontinent. In 1957 the Indian government's Calendar Reform Committee adopted the National Calendar of India for civil purposes and, in addition, defined guidelines to standardise computation of the religious calendar, which is based on astronomical observations. The civil calendar is used throughout India today for administrative purposes, but a variety of religious calendars remain in use. We present the civil calendar here.
The National Calendar of India is composed of 12 months. The first month, Caitra, is 30 days in normal and 31 days in leap years. This is followed by five consecutive 31 day months, then six 30 day months. Leap years in the Indian calendar occur in the same years as as in the Gregorian calendar; the two calendars thus have identical accuracy and remain synchronised.
Years in the Indian calendar are counted from the start of
the Saka Era, the equinox of March 22nd of year 79 in the
Gregorian calendar, designated day 1 of month
Caitra of year 1 in the Saka Era. The calendar was
officially adopted on 1 Caitra, 1879 Saka Era, or
March 22nd, 1957 Gregorian. Since year 1 of the Indian
calendar differs from year 1 of the Gregorian, to
determine whether a year in the Indian calendar is a leap
year, add 78 to the year of the Saka era then
apply the Gregorian calendar rule to the sum.
The French Republican calendar was adopted by a decree of La Convention Nationale on Gregorian date October 5, 1793 and went into effect the following November 24th, on which day Fabre d'glantine proposed to the Convention the names for the months. It incarnates the revolutionary spirit of “Out with the old! In with the relentlessly rational!” which later gave rise in 1795 to the metric system of weights and measures which has proven more durable than the Republican calendar.
The calendar consists of 12 months of 30 days each, followed by a five- or six-day holiday period, the jours complmentaires or sans-culottides. Months are grouped into four seasons; the three months of each season end with the same letters and rhyme with one another. The calendar begins on Gregorian date September 22nd, 1792, the September equinox and date of the founding of the First Republic. This day is designated the first day of the month of Vendmiaire in year 1 of the Republic. Subsequent years begin on the day in which the September equinox occurs as reckoned at the Paris meridian. Days begin at true solar midnight. Whether the sans-culottides period contains five or six days depends on the actual date of the equinox. Consequently, there is no leap year rule per se: 366 day years do not recur in a regular pattern but instead follow the dictates of astronomy. The calendar therefore stays perfectly aligned with the seasons. No attempt is made to synchronise months with the phases of the Moon.
The Republican calendar is rare in that it has no concept of a seven day week. Each thirty day month is divided into three dcades of ten days each, the last of which, dcadi, was the day of rest. (The word “dcade” may confuse English speakers; the French noun denoting ten years is “dcennie”.) The names of days in the dcade are derived from their number in the ten day sequence. The five or six days of the sans-culottides do not bear the names of the dcade. Instead, each of these holidays commemorates an aspect of the republican spirit. The last, jour de la Rvolution, occurs only in years of 366 days.
Napolon abolished the Republican calendar in favour of the Gregorian on January 1st, 1806. Thus France, one of the first countries to adopt the Gregorian calendar (in December 1582), became the only country to subsequently abandon and then re-adopt it. During the period of the Paris Commune uprising in 1871 the Republican calendar was again briefly used.
The original decree
which established the Republican calendar contained a
contradiction: it defined the year as starting on the day
of the true autumnal equinox in Paris, but further prescribed
a four year cycle called la Franciade, the fourth
year of which would end with le jour de la Rvolution
and hence contain 366 days. These two specifications are
incompatible, as 366 day years defined by the equinox do
not recur on a regular four year schedule. This problem was
recognised shortly after the calendar was proclaimed, but the
calendar was abandoned five years before the first conflict
would have occurred and the issue was never formally resolved. Here
we assume the equinox rule prevails, as a rigid four year
cycle would be no more accurate than the Julian calendar, which
couldn't possibly be the intent of its enlightened Republican
designers.
The
International Standards Organisation
(ISO) issued
Standard ISO 8601, “Representation of Dates” in 1988,
superseding the earlier ISO 2015. The bulk of the standard
consists of standards for representing dates in the
Gregorian calendar including the highly recommended
“YYYY-MM-DD” form which is unambiguous, free of cultural
bias, can be sorted into order without rearrangement, and is
Y9K compliant. In addition, ISO 8601 formally defines the
“calendar week” often encountered in commercial transactions
in Europe. The first calendar week of a year: week 1, is
that week which contains the first Thursday of the year (or,
equivalently, the week which includes January 4th of the
year; the first day of that week is the previous Monday).
The last week: week 52 or 53 depending on the
date of Monday in the first week, is that which contains
December 28th of the year. The first ISO calendar week of a
given year starts with a Monday which can be as early as
December 29th of the previous year or as late as January
4th of the present; the last calendar week can end as late
as Sunday, January 3rd of the subsequent year.
ISO 8601 dates in year, week, and day form are written
with a “W” preceding the week number, which bears a leading
zero if less than 10, for example February 29th, 2000
is written as 2000-02-29 in year, month, day format and
2000-W09-2 in year, week, day form; since the day number
can never exceed 7, only a single digit is required.
The hyphens may be elided for brevity and the day number
omitted if not required. You will frequently see date of
manufacture codes such as “00W09” stamped on products; this
is an abbreviation of 2000-W09, the ninth week of year 2000.
In solar calendars such as the Gregorian, only days and years have physical significance: days are defined by the rotation of the Earth, and years by its orbit about the Sun. Months, decoupled from the phases of the Moon, are but a memory of forgotten lunar calendars, while weeks of seven days are entirely a social construct—while most calendars in use today adopt a cycle of seven day names or numbers, calendars with name cycles ranging from four to sixty days have been used by other cultures in history.
ISO 8601 permits us to jettison the historical and cultural baggage of weeks and months and express a date simply by the year and day number within that year, ranging from 001 for January 1st through 365 (366 in a leap year) for December 31st. This format makes it easy to do arithmetic with dates within a year, and only slightly more complicated for periods which span year boundaries. You'll see this representation used in project planning and for specifying delivery dates. ISO dates in this form are written as “YYYY-DDD”, for example 2000-060 for February 29th, 2000; leading zeroes are always written in the day number, but the hyphen may be omitted for brevity.
All ISO 8601 date formats have the advantages of being
fixed length (at least until the Y10K crisis rolls around) and, when
stored in a computer, of being sorted in date order
by an alphanumeric sort of their textual representations.
The ISO week and day and day of year calendars are
derivative of the Gregorian calendar and share its accuracy.
Development of the Unix operating system began at Bell Laboratories in 1969 by Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, with the first PDP-11 version becoming operational in February 1971. Unix wisely adopted the convention that all internal dates and times (for example, the time of creation and last modification of files) were kept in Universal Time, and converted to local time based on a per-user time zone specification. This far-sighted choice has made it vastly easier to integrate Unix systems into far-flung networks without a chaos of conflicting time settings.
Many machines on which Unix was initially widely deployed could not support arithmetic on integers longer than 32 bits without costly multiple-precision computation in software. The internal representation of time was therefore chosen to be the number of seconds elapsed since 00:00 Universal time on January 1, 1970 in the Gregorian calendar (Julian day 2440587.5), with time stored as a 32 bit signed integer (long in early C implementations).
The influence of Unix time representation has spread well beyond Unix since most C and C++ libraries on other systems provide Unix-compatible time and date functions. The major drawback of Unix time representation is that, if kept as a 32 bit signed quantity, on January 19, 2038 it will go negative, resulting in chaos in programs unprepared for this. Unix and C implementations wisely (for reasons described below) define the result of the time() function as type time_t, which leaves the door open for remediation (by changing the definition to a 64 bit integer, for example) before the clock ticks the dreaded doomsday second.
C compilers on Unix systems prior to 7th Edition lacked the
32-bit long type. On earlier systems time_t,
the value returned by the time() function, was an array
of two 16-bit ints which, concatenated, represented the
32-bit value. This is the reason why time() accepts a
pointer argument to the result (prior to 7th Edition it returned
a status, not the 32-bit time) and ctime() requires a
pointer to its input argument. Thanks to Eric Allman (author
of sendmail) for
pointing out these historical nuggets.
Spreadsheet calculations frequently need to do arithmetic with date and time quantities—for example, calculating the interest on a loan with a given term. When Microsoft Excel was introduced for the PC Windows platform, it defined dates and times as “serial values”, which express dates and times as the number of days elapsed since midnight on January 1, 1900 with time given as a fraction of a day. Midnight on January 1, 1900 is day 1.0 in this scheme. Time zone is unspecified in Excel dates, with the NOW() function returning whatever the computer's clock is set to—in most cases local time, so when combining data from machines in different time zones you usually need to add or subtract the bias, which can differ over the year due to observance of summer time. Here we assume Excel dates represent Universal (Greenwich Mean) time, since there isn't any other rational choice. But don't assume you can always get away with this.
You'd be entitled to think, therefore, that conversion back and forth between PC Excel serial values and Julian day numbers would simply be a matter of adding or subtracting the Julian day number of December 31, 1899 (since the PC Excel days are numbered from 1). But this is a Microsoft calendar, remember, so one must first look to make sure it doesn't contain one of those bonehead blunders characteristic of Microsoft. As is usually the case, one doesn't have to look very far. If you have a copy of PC Excel, fire it up, format a cell as containing a date, and type 60 into it: out pops “February 29, 1900”. News apparently travels very slowly from Rome to Redmond—ever since Pope Gregory revised the calendar in 1582, years divisible by 100 have not been leap years, and consequently the year 1900 contained no February 29th. Due to this morsel of information having been lost somewhere between the Holy See and the Infernal Seattle monopoly, all Excel day numbers for days subsequent to February 28th, 1900 are one day greater than the actual day count from January 1, 1900. Further, note that any computation of the number of days in a period which begins in January or February 1900 and ends in a subsequent month will be off by one—the day count will be one greater than the actual number of days elapsed.
By the time the 1900 blunder was discovered, Excel users had created millions of spreadsheets containing incorrect day numbers, so Microsoft decided to leave the error in place rather than force users to convert their spreadsheets, and the error remains to this day. Note, however, that only 1900 is affected; while the first release of Excel probably also screwed up all years divisible by 100 and hence implemented a purely Julian calendar, contemporary versions do correctly count days in 2000 (which is a leap year, being divisible by 400), 2100, and subsequent end of century years.
PC Excel day numbers are valid only between 1 (January 1, 1900) and
2958465 (December 31, 9999). Although a serial day counting scheme
has no difficulty coping with arbitrary date ranges or days before
the start of the epoch (given sufficient precision in the representation
of numbers), Excel doesn't do so. Day 0 is deemed the idiotic
January 0, 1900 (at least in Excel 97), and negative days and
those in Y10K and beyond are not handled at all. Further, old
versions of Excel did date arithmetic using 16 bit quantities
and did not support day numbers greater than 65380 (December
31, 2078); I do not know in which release of Excel this
limitation was remedied.
Having saddled every PC Excel user with a defective date numbering scheme wasn't enough for Microsoft—nothing ever is. Next, they proceeded to come out with a Macintosh version of Excel which uses an entirely different day numbering system based on the MacOS native time format which counts days elapsed since January 1, 1904. To further obfuscate matters, on the Macintosh they chose to number days from zero rather than 1, so midnight on January 1, 1904 has serial value 0.0. By starting in 1904, they avoided screwing up 1900 as they did on the PC. So now Excel users who interchange data have to cope with two incompatible schemes for counting days, one of which thinks 1900 was a leap year and the other which doesn't go back that far. To compound the fun, you can now select either date system on either platform, so you can't be certain dates are compatible even when receiving data from another user with same kind of machine you're using. I'm sure this was all done in the interest of the “efficiency” of which Microsoft is so fond. As we all know, it would take a computer almost forever to add or subtract four in order to make everything seamlessly interchangeable.
Macintosh Excel day numbers are valid only between 0
(January 1, 1904) and 2957003 (December 31, 9999). Although
a serial day counting scheme has no difficulty coping with
arbitrary date ranges or days before the start of the epoch
(given sufficient precision in the representation of
numbers), Excel doesn't do so. Negative days and those in
Y10K and beyond are not handled at all. Further, old
versions of Excel did date arithmetic using 16 bit
quantities and did not support day numbers greater than
63918 (December 31, 2078); I do not know in which release of
Excel this limitation was remedied.
|
Click on titles to order books on-line from
|
|
|