Grille De Cotation Dessin Du Bonhomme Goodenough -

Most searches for "grille de cotation dessin du bonhomme" actually lead to the Harris revision (Draw-A-Person: DAP). Harris improved Goodenough’s grid by:

In clinical practice today, the Koppitz Emotional Indicators (1970s) are often merged with the Goodenough grid to assess emotional and social maturity alongside cognitive.

Si vous êtes parent, enseignant ou psychologue en herbe, vous avez probablement déjà demandé à un enfant : "Dessine-moi un bonhomme". Mais saviez-vous que derrière ce simple croquis se cache un outil d'évaluation psychométrique mondialement connu ?

C'est ici qu'intervient la grille de cotation du dessin du bonhomme de Goodenough. Cet article décortique cette méthode d'évaluation, son histoire, ses critères et la manière de l'interpréter. grille de cotation dessin du bonhomme goodenough

Using the Grille de cotation is methodical:

| Raw Score (Man) | Approximate Mental Age | Interpretation | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 0 – 5 | 3.0 – 3.5 years | Scribbling; no human form recognized. | | 6 – 10 | 4.0 – 5.0 years | "Tadpole" figure (head with legs attached). Basic parts emerging. | | 11 – 20 | 5.5 – 7.0 years | Complete figure with trunk, arms, and major features. | | 21 – 30 | 7.5 – 9.0 years | Proportions improving; clothing and joints appear. | | 31 – 40 | 9.5 – 11.0 years | Profile, heels, correct limb attachment. | | 41 – 51 | 12+ years | Advanced coordination and detail (pupils, multiple fingers, shading). |

For nearly a century, the simple instruction “Draw a man” has been a powerful window into a child’s cognitive development. While it looks like a fun art project, the resulting drawing is often dissected using a precise, scientific tool: La Grille de Cotation de Goodenough (The Goodenough Scoring Grid). Most searches for "grille de cotation dessin du

Originally published in 1926 by psychologist Florence Goodenough, the Draw-a-Man Test (later revised to the Draw-a-Person test) was one of the first non-verbal intelligence tests. It moved away from language and culture-heavy questions, instead focusing on what a child knows about the human body.

But how exactly does the scoring grid separate a random scribble from a developmentally significant sketch?

Why would a psychologist use this 100-year-old test in the age of MRI and digital IQ tests? In clinical practice today, the Koppitz Emotional Indicators

Before diving into the grille de cotation, we must understand the test’s origin. Florence Goodenough created the Draw-a-Man Test (later revised to Draw-a-Person) as a non-verbal intelligence test. Unlike verbal IQ tests (like the Binet-Simon scale) that require reading or language fluency, this test only requires a blank sheet of paper and a pencil.

The core hypothesis: The level of detail and accuracy in a child’s drawing correlates directly with their mental age (MA). A child who draws a head with two eyes, a nose, a mouth, hair, a neck, a torso, arms with fingers, and legs with feet has a higher conceptual grasp of the human body than a child who draws a "tadpole" man (circle with two dangling lines).

The grille de cotation transforms this drawing into a standardized score.

Modern psychology acknowledges the Goodenough grid is dated. It relies heavily on visual-motor skills, which can penalize children with fine motor delays (like dysgraphia) even if their verbal IQ is high. Furthermore, the grid was standardized primarily on Western children; cultural differences in dress or artistic conventions (e.g., some cultures emphasize the head larger than life) can skew results.