No BTS bush plane can touch this. An FSX-style racer might match it, but the RV-7 does it with docile stall characteristics.
Note: “BTS” is ambiguous. In RV circles, BTS often refers to a backcountry training provider (e.g., BTS Aviation) or a mod philosophy. I’ll assume backcountry / tailwheel training.
What it is: Real‑world flight training, tailwheel endorsements, or RV transition training (often in an RV‑7 or similar).
Why it’s “better” for real‑world pilots: fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better
Weakness: Expensive ($200‑400/hr for RV rental + instruction). No virtual flying.
Bottom line: Better if you own or plan to fly a real RV and need real‑world proficiency.
| Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | Overspeeding in descent | Close throttle, extend speed brakes (if modeled) or slip | | Ballooning on flare | Reduce power earlier, look down runway, not at ground | | Dutch roll in turbulence | Relax grip — RV-7 dampens quickly | | Forgetting rudder in turns | Lead with slight rudder — RV-7 needs coordination | No BTS bush plane can touch this
You fly with a club, do airshow practice, and love snap rolls.
Here’s the truth: No single airframe is “better” for everyone. But if you force a decision based on the keyword "fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better"…
The Vans RV-7 / RV-7A is the better compromise. | Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | Overspeeding
The RV-7/7A wins because:
Before we compare, we must define each piece of the puzzle.