Many users ask: "Why download a native app when the extension is lighter?" Here is a direct comparison:
| Feature | Browser Extension | Native App | |---------|------------------|------------| | Download Speed | Moderate | Very Fast (multi-threaded) | | File Size Limit | Browser dependent | Unlimited (disk space only) | | Supports 8K/60fps | Rarely | Yes | | Works with 1000+ sites | Yes | Yes (more robust detection) | | Converter included | No | Yes | | Works when browser closed | No | Yes (background mode) | | Memory footprint | ~50MB | ~120MB | ant video downloader native app
Bottom line: The extension is fine for occasional small downloads. But for power users, the native app is vastly superior. Many users ask: "Why download a native app
let config = URLSessionConfiguration.background(withIdentifier: "com.ant.downloader")
let session = URLSession(configuration: config, delegate: self, delegateQueue: nil)
let task = session.downloadTask(with: url)
task.resume()
val request = Request.Builder()
.url(url)
.addHeader("Range", "bytes=$downloadedBytes-")
.build()
val response = okHttpClient.newCall(request).execute()
// stream response.body and append to file
One concern with lesser-known downloaders is security. The original Ant extension is open-source and generally considered safe, but users should always: val request = Request