372. Missax -

There are three primary reasons why 372. Missax has become a high-volume search term:

We reduce from the classic Maximum Independent Set in Unit‑Disk Graphs (MIS‑UDG), known to be NP‑complete.

Since MIS‑UDG is NP‑complete, the decision version of Missax is also NP‑complete when Δ is part of the input. ∎

User reviews on adult film forums (like PornGap or Data18) frequently mention the color grading of 372. The use of red light filters creates a voyeuristic, "security camera" vibe. This is a departure from the stark white lighting used in earlier Missax episodes (like 340 or 355). 372. Missax

Let

[ A = \langle a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n\rangle \qquad (a_i\in\mathbb Z) ]

be a sequence of n integers.

A strictly monotone subsequence of A is a subsequence

[ B = \langle a_i_1, a_i_2, \dots, a_i_k\rangle,\qquad 1\le i_1 < i_2 < \dots < i_k\le n, ]

such that either

[ a_i_1<a_i_2<\dots<a_i_k\quad\text(strictly increasing) ]

or

[ a_i_1>a_i_2>\dots>a_i_k\quad\text(strictly decreasing) . ] There are three primary reasons why 372

The algorithm works for both increasing and decreasing variants; the final answer is the maximum of the two.

We process the sequence left‑to‑right, maintaining a balanced binary search tree (BBST) keyed by the last value of each candidate subsequence length. For each element a_i we query the BBST for the longest subsequence that can be extended while respecting both monotonicity and the Δ‑gap.